Commentary: When Targeting DEI Means Restricting Research and Academics
Liliana M. Garces, Eliza Epstein and Jackie Pedota are co-authors of forthcoming studies, funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Trellis Foundation, examining how anti-DEI legislation reshapes institutional life and the production and transfer of knowledge in public universities. Garces currently serves as vice president of research and public impact at the Alliance for Higher Education, where Pedota also serves as a fellow.
The mission of public universities is a sacred one: to advance knowledge for the public good through teaching, research and community engagement. But that mission depends on independence: Faculty and students must have the freedom to ask difficult questions and follow evidence wherever it leads – free from political interference.
While recent federal actions to dictate curriculum, steer research agendas and condition funding have drawn public attention and ire, bans on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives pose a quieter but equally consequential threat. Though many think these bans focus solely on eliminating student-support policies and admissions and programs, they are also quietly narrowing the scope of what students and communities are allowed to know.
At a public university in Texas, we have been studying how anti-DEI laws operate in practice, focusing on Texas’ Senate Bill 17, which took effect in 2024. S.B. 17, like similar laws in other states, bars public universities from funding a vaguely defined range of DEI activities – such as dedicated offices, mandatory training and race‑ or sex‑based “preferential treatment” – while introducing new compliance, audit and enforcement mechanisms for institutions. The law also explicitly carves out important exceptions for core academic functions, like academic course instruction, scholarly research and the dissemination of academic work.
But what began as an effort to dismantle DEI infrastructure has had cascading effects that limit curriculum and research agendas.
Read More
View All Resources
AIM Committee Negotiated Rulemaking: Faculty and Association Statements on Academic Freedom and Intellectual Diversity

THE RANT podcast with Eloy Ortiz Oakley: Accreditation Under Fire with Mike Gavin

Commentary: When Targeting DEI Means Restricting Research and Academics

Q and A with Alliance President Mike Gavin: Seeking Strength in Numbers

President Mike Gavin and VP Liliana M. Garces join Student Affairs Now Podcast

Inside Higher Ed's editor-in-chief explores 'NATO for universities' in column

Podcast: Key findings from Inside Higher Ed’s 2026 survey of college and university presidents

The fifth pillar of democracy: Is it time for a ‘NATO for higher education’?

‘Authority Over Expertise’: Scholars Spotlight Political Takeover of General Education in Alliance Webinar

New Accreditation Rules Could Open ‘Can of Worms’ in Higher Ed, Experts Say

New Alliance for Higher Education Fellowship Program, Fellows, Seek to Advance Higher Education as Fifth Pillar of Democracy

Principled Leadership to Advance Public Trust in Higher Education

Alliance President and CEO Mike Gavin in Inside Higher Ed: Weaponization of Student Aid Is the Next Frontier

Alliance President grades ED letter to Middle States asserting illegal DEI, finds lack of legal foundation

Higher education experts outline impending threat: the weaponization of accreditation, federal student aid

EDU Ledger Features the Alliance’s Mission to Protect the "Fifth Pillar of Democracy"

American higher education shines on Winter Olympics’ global stage

“The goal is to change institutional behavior.” Experts dissect the unlawful Dept. of Ed Feb. 2025 Dear Colleague Letter

Letter to Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education in Opposition of Executive Order 2026-07

Daily Briefing: A response to Project 2025?

Hitting Pause on the ‘Dear Colleague’ Letter

36 Organizational Partners, Call on Texas A&M to Rescind Censorship Policies

New Alliance Aims to Protect Colleges and Universities From Government Meddling
